Peer Review Process
Mathews Open Access Journals follows double blind peer review process. In this we do not reveal author names, affiliations to the reviewer and vice versa. We adhere to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), code of conduct, and best practice guidelines (http://publicationethics.org). We strive to ensure that the peer review is fair, unbiased and timely. Decisions to accept or reject a manuscript for publication in the journal are based on the manuscript’s importance, originality, clarity, and the study’s validity and its relevance to remit of the journal. The process also involves strictly no plagiarism or fabrication of the data and parallel submissions.
Being a reviewer you are accountable to take the responsibility of maintaining confidentiality of ideas that have been presented in the papers assigned to review. Focus your evaluation on merits and demerits of the article; assess the correctness, accuracy, clarity, and innovation of the research. Never reveal the assigned paper's results or videos/images or any of the supplementary material to non-reviewers.
The reviewers are given ample time for the review and submission of comments to the editorial office. Reviewers’ evaluations play a major role in our decision as to whether to accept a manuscript for publication.
Published : 30th December 2020
Authors : Tatiany Bertollo COZER1, Marcela Carvalho ESPALADORI2, Micena Roberta Miranda Alves e Silva2, Maria Tereza SCARDUA1
Citation : Cozer TB, et al. Faciometrics: A Practical Guide for Orofacial Harmonization. M J Derm. 04(1):14.
Published : 20th November 2018
Authors : Nida Tabassum Khan*, Namra Jameel
Citation : Khan NT and Jameel N (2018). Incidence of Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in the General Adult Population of Quetta, Balochistan, in Pakistan. Mathews J Dermatol. 3(1): 013.
Published : 27th May 2017
Author : Ahmed Al-Imam*1,2
Citation : Al-Imam A. (2017). A Case of Remitting Psoriasis in Association with Hyperthyroidism in a Morbidly Obese Iraqi Female. Mathews J Dermatol. 2(1): 012.
Published : 27th March 2017
Authors : Nida Tabassum Khan*, Jibran Jameel, Maham Jameel Khan, Saad Umer Abdul Rehman, Namra Jameel
Citation : Khan NT, Jameel J, Khan MJ, Rehaman SUA, et al. (2017). Body Image and Weight Concern among Pakistani Adolescent Females. Mathews J Dermatol. 2(1): 011.
Published : 24th February 2017
Authors : Ahmed M. Kabel1,2*, Fatma M. Moharm3,4
Citation : Kabel AM and Moharm FM. (2017). Insights into Dermatological Applications and Cutaneous Toxicities of Bleomycin. Mathews J Dermatol. 2(1): 010
Published : 10th January 2017
Authors : Arun K Mishra1, Amrita Mishra1
Citation : Mishra AK and Mishra A. (2017). Cosmetics for Dermal Care from Marine Origin. M J Derm. 2(1): 009.
Published : 06th January 2017
Authors : Adam Kaiser1, Adam Semanoff2, Victor Nannini3, Zachary Chadnick4
Citation : Kaiser AC, Nannini V, Semanoff A and Chadnick Z. (2017). Steatocystoma Multiplex: A Case Report of a Rare Disease Diagnosed in a Trauma Patient. Mathews J Dermatol. 2(1): 008.
Published : 21st July 2016
Authors : Rui Li1 , Pelz J1 , Haake AR1
Citation : Li R, Pelz J and Haake AR. (2016). Using Experts’ Perceptual Skill for Dermatological Image Segmentation. Mathews J Dermatol. 1(1): 007
Published : 17th June 2016
Author : Manahel Mahmood AlSabbagh
Citation : AlSabbagh MM. (2016). Risk Factors and Complications of Herpes Zoster. Mathews J Dermatol. 1(1): 006.
Subscribe to our RSS feed, be in touch with our articles, news, videos, reebies.