Peer Review Process
Mathews Open Access Journals follows double blind peer review process. In this we do not reveal author names, affiliations to the reviewer and vice versa. We adhere to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), code of conduct, and best practice guidelines (http://publicationethics.org). We strive to ensure that the peer review is fair, unbiased and timely. Decisions to accept or reject a manuscript for publication in the journal are based on the manuscript’s importance, originality, clarity, and the study’s validity and its relevance to remit of the journal. The process also involves strictly no plagiarism or fabrication of the data and parallel submissions.
Responsibilities
Being a reviewer you are accountable to take the responsibility of maintaining confidentiality of ideas that have been presented in the papers assigned to review. Focus your evaluation on merits and demerits of the article; assess the correctness, accuracy, clarity, and innovation of the research. Never reveal the assigned paper's results or videos/images or any of the supplementary material to non-reviewers.
The reviewers are given ample time for the review and submission of comments to the editorial office. Reviewers’ evaluations play a major role in our decision as to whether to accept a manuscript for publication.
Ethical Issues
The reviewer should be honest, transparent. Should not be biased in the decision, and exact analysis of the research.
After receiving the paper for any further assistance or clarifications you need to contact only the editorial office and the confidentiality of the paper has to be maintained.
You must never ask anyone to review a portion of paper without editor's permission and also must never contact the author of the paper directly.
Final decision in accepting/ rejecting of the manuscript is solely decided by Chief-Editor of the journal.
The reviewer can also inform the editor regarding suspected duplicate publication, plagiarism, or any ethical concerns about the use of animals or humans in the research that has be done by author.
Published : 09th March 2023
Authors : M Ali1, Samreen Riaz2,*
Citation : Samreen R, et al. (2023). Cancer Treatment and Pharmacogenomics. Mathews J Cancer Sci. 8(1):38.
Published : 10th February 2023
Authors : Min Li1, Lili Yang1, Shi Liu1, Lili Chen2, CM Charlie Ma2*
Citation : Li M, et al. (2023). Endocrine Late Effects of Radiation Therapy in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients with Brain Tumors. Mathews J Cancer Sci. 8(1):37.
Published : 27th January 2023
Authors : Gashaw Arega1*, Daniel Hailu1, Abdulkadir Mohammedsaid Gidey1, Abel Hailu1, Mulualeme Nigusie1, Getasew Fikad1, Sewagegnh Yeshiwas2, Abrehet Zeray3, Samuel Sisay3
Citation : Arega G, et al. (2023). A Rare Case of Childhood Adrenocortical Carcinoma in a 4-Years-Old Female Child Presented with Features of Cushing Syndrome: Case Report and Literature Review. Mathews J Cancer Sci. 8(1):36.
Published : 17th October 2022
Authors : Motohiro Chosokabe1,2* Yasushi Ariizumi1,2 and Junki Koike1
Citation : Chosokabe M, et al. (2022). Remote Rapid Intraoperative Diagnosis Support System Using the Remote Desktop. Mathews J Cancer Sci. 7(3):35.
Published : 22nd September 2022
Author : Leslie C Costello, PhD*
Citation : Costello LC. (2022). The Genetic Evolution of “Decreased Zinc” Malignancies and Their Treatment. Mathews J Cancer Sci. 7(3):34.
Published : 26th July 2022
Authors : Safa Al Shaikh*, Aalaa S. Shubbar
Citation : Al Shaikh S, et al. (2022). Evaluation and Analysis of Colon Cancer in Kingdom of Bahrain: A Retrospective Study in a Tertiary Care Center. Mathews J Cancer Sci. 7(2):32.