Peer Review Process
Mathews Open Access Journals follows double blind peer review process. In this we do not reveal author names, affiliations to the reviewer and vice versa. We adhere to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), code of conduct, and best practice guidelines (http://publicationethics.org). We strive to ensure that the peer review is fair, unbiased and timely. Decisions to accept or reject a manuscript for publication in the journal are based on the manuscript’s importance, originality, clarity, and the study’s validity and its relevance to remit of the journal. The process also involves strictly no plagiarism or fabrication of the data and parallel submissions.
Responsibilities
Being a reviewer you are accountable to take the responsibility of maintaining confidentiality of ideas that have been presented in the papers assigned to review. Focus your evaluation on merits and demerits of the article; assess the correctness, accuracy, clarity, and innovation of the research. Never reveal the assigned paper's results or videos/images or any of the supplementary material to non-reviewers.
The reviewers are given ample time for the review and submission of comments to the editorial office. Reviewers’ evaluations play a major role in our decision as to whether to accept a manuscript for publication.
Ethical Issues
The reviewer should be honest, transparent. Should not be biased in the decision, and exact analysis of the research.
After receiving the paper for any further assistance or clarifications you need to contact only the editorial office and the confidentiality of the paper has to be maintained.
You must never ask anyone to review a portion of paper without editor's permission and also must never contact the author of the paper directly.
Final decision in accepting/ rejecting of the manuscript is solely decided by Chief-Editor of the journal.
The reviewer can also inform the editor regarding suspected duplicate publication, plagiarism, or any ethical concerns about the use of animals or humans in the research that has be done by author.
Published : 11th September 2023
Authors :
Mwanja Moses1,*, Lopwonya Fred2
Citation : Moses M, et al. (2023). Histopathological Patterns of Cervical Cancer among Females Presenting to a Pathology Core Reference Laboratory in Kampala, Uganda: A 5-Year Review. Mathews J Cancer Sci. 8(3):43.
Published : 04th September 2023
Authors : Luiz Eduardo Imbelloni1,*, Anna Lúcia Calaça Rivoli2, Sylvio Valença de Lemos Neto3, Ana Cristina Pinho3, Livia dos Santos Pereira4
Citation : Imbelloni LE, et al. (2023). Nephrectomy in an Infant during Intraoperative Cardiac Arrest, Requiring Prolonged Resuscitation. Case Report. Mathews J Cancer Sci. 8(3):42.
Published : 25th April 2023
Authors : Humberto Martínez-Cordero1,2,3,*, Luis Antonio Salazar2, Jair Figueroa2, Maria Isabel Arbeláez2, Alejandro Rico Mendoza3,4, Alexandra Porras Ramírez3,4,5, Henry Idrobo2, Viviana Olaya2, Kenny Gálvez2, Sergio Cancelado2, Juan Manuel Herrera2, Leonardo Bautista Toloza2, Jessica Zapata Malagón3, Lorena Cubillos Osorio3, Isabella Novoa-Caicedo3, On Behalf of GRIMMCO (Colombian Multiple Myeloma Research Group) and GRHEMUB (El Bosque University Hematology Group)
Citation : Martínez-Cordero H, et al. (2023). First Report of M-My Mind Study. Mathews J Cancer Sci. 8(2):41.
Published : 17th April 2023
Author : Pankaj Goyal*, Kishan Kumawat
Citation : Goyal P, et al. (2023). Upper Jaw Cancer: A Case Report of Surgical Intervention and Defect Repair in an Upper Alveolar Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Mathews J Cancer Sci. 8(2):39.
Published : 15th April 2023
Authors : Nisarg Hajariwala1,*, Prince Shah2, Prutha Patel2, Archi Desai2, Jaikumar Patel3
Citation : Hajariwala N, et al. (2023). A Case Report on Rituximab-induced Interstitial Lung Disease. Mathews J Cancer Sci. 8(2):40.
Published : 09th March 2023
Authors : M Ali1, Samreen Riaz2,*
Citation : Samreen R, et al. (2023). Cancer Treatment and Pharmacogenomics. Mathews J Cancer Sci. 8(1):38.