Peer Review Process
Mathews Open Access Journals follows double blind peer review process. In this we do not reveal author names, affiliations to the reviewer and vice versa. We adhere to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), code of conduct, and best practice guidelines (http://publicationethics.org). We strive to ensure that the peer review is fair, unbiased and timely. Decisions to accept or reject a manuscript for publication in the journal are based on the manuscript’s importance, originality, clarity, and the study’s validity and its relevance to remit of the journal. The process also involves strictly no plagiarism or fabrication of the data and parallel submissions.
Responsibilities
Being a reviewer you are accountable to take the responsibility of maintaining confidentiality of ideas that have been presented in the papers assigned to review. Focus your evaluation on merits and demerits of the article; assess the correctness, accuracy, clarity, and innovation of the research. Never reveal the assigned paper's results or videos/images or any of the supplementary material to non-reviewers.
The reviewers are given ample time for the review and submission of comments to the editorial office. Reviewers’ evaluations play a major role in our decision as to whether to accept a manuscript for publication.
Ethical Issues
The reviewer should be honest, transparent. Should not be biased in the decision, and exact analysis of the research.
After receiving the paper for any further assistance or clarifications you need to contact only the editorial office and the confidentiality of the paper has to be maintained.
You must never ask anyone to review a portion of paper without editor's permission and also must never contact the author of the paper directly.
Final decision in accepting/ rejecting of the manuscript is solely decided by Chief-Editor of the journal.
The reviewer can also inform the editor regarding suspected duplicate publication, plagiarism, or any ethical concerns about the use of animals or humans in the research that has be done by author.
Published : 17th March 2024
Authors : CM Charlie Ma*, Ahmed Eldib, Shahabeddin M Aslmarand, Lili Chen
Citation : Ma CMC, et al. (2024). Fraction-Modulated Dose Optimization for Advanced Radiation Therapy. Mathews J Cancer Sci. 9(1):47.
Published : 24th November 2023
Author : Mwanja Moses*
Citation : Moses M. (2023). Elevating Patient Voices for Enhanced Patient Care Safety. Mathews J Cancer Sci. 8(4):46.
Published : 09th November 2023
Authors : Manosha Lakmali Perera1,*, Kanapathipillai Ellukupillai Vamadevan2
Citation : Perera ML, et al. (2023). Are Dietary and Environmental Factors Responsible for the Increasing Incidence of Prostate Cancer in Sri Lanka over Past Ten Years? Mathews J Cancer Sci. 8(4):45.
Published : 08th November 2023
Authors : Eldib A*, Chen L, Price RA, Ma CM
Citation : Eldib A, et al. (2023). Dosimetric Investigation of Modulation Capabilities of a Novel Rotating Gamma Ray System. Mathews J Cancer Sci. 8(3):47.
Published : 18th October 2023
Author : Glenn C Ma*
Citation : Ma GC. (2023). Effect of Radiobiological Model Parameterization on Radiotherapy Dose Conversion. Mathews J Cancer Sci. 8(3):44.
Published : 11th September 2023
Authors :
Mwanja Moses1,*, Lopwonya Fred2
Citation : Moses M, et al. (2023). Histopathological Patterns of Cervical Cancer among Females Presenting to a Pathology Core Reference Laboratory in Kampala, Uganda: A 5-Year Review. Mathews J Cancer Sci. 8(3):43.