Peer Review Process
Mathews Open Access Journals follows double blind peer review process. In this we do not reveal author names, affiliations to the reviewer and vice versa. We adhere to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), code of conduct, and best practice guidelines (http://publicationethics.org). We strive to ensure that the peer review is fair, unbiased and timely. Decisions to accept or reject a manuscript for publication in the journal are based on the manuscript’s importance, originality, clarity, and the study’s validity and its relevance to remit of the journal. The process also involves strictly no plagiarism or fabrication of the data and parallel submissions.
Responsibilities
Being a reviewer you are accountable to take the responsibility of maintaining confidentiality of ideas that have been presented in the papers assigned to review. Focus your evaluation on merits and demerits of the article; assess the correctness, accuracy, clarity, and innovation of the research. Never reveal the assigned paper's results or videos/images or any of the supplementary material to non-reviewers.
The reviewers are given ample time for the review and submission of comments to the editorial office. Reviewers’ evaluations play a major role in our decision as to whether to accept a manuscript for publication.
Ethical Issues
Published : 31st December 2020
Authors : Vincenzo De Simone*, Antonio Mugnolo, Alberto Zamboni, Giorgio Morando
Citation : De Simone V, et al. (2020). Myocardial infarction in Covid-19 era: a dramatic dip into the past?. Mathews J Cardiol. (5)1:22.
Published : 18th September 2019
Authors : Yutian Sun1, Hong Gao1, Boqi Hu2
Citation : Hu B. (2019). Multimodality Evaluation of Multiple Mitral Valve Myxomas: A Rare, Benign but Potentially Life-Threatening Tumor. Mathews J Cardiol 4(1): 21.
Published : 03rd March 2019
Author : Yasser Mohammed Hassanain Elsayed*
Citation : Elsayed YMH (2019). Test the Vasospastic ST-Segment Depression Reversibility with Nitrates in Non-Obstructive Coronary Disease. Mathews J Cardiol 4(1): 20.
Published : 15th November 2018
Authors : Osmar Antonio Centurión1,2*, FACC, FAHA, José Fernando Alderete1 , Judith María Torales1,2, Laura Beatriz García1,2, Karina Elizabeth Scavenius1
Citation : Centaurión OA, Alderete JF, Morales JM, Garcían LB, et al. (2018). Augmented Atrial Vulnerability in Patients with Sinus Node 3 Dysfunction: Is the Electrophysiologic Abnormality Limited Only to the Sinus Node?. Mathews J Cardiol. 3(1): 019.
Published : 14th November 2018
Authors : Luca Anfuso1 , Massimo Corsi1 , Antonio Fasano1,2
Citation : Anfuso L, Corsi M and Fasano A. (2018). Esophageal Thermal Probes: How Fast Should They Be?. Mathews J Cardiol. 3(1): 018.
Published : 25th September 2018
Authors : Osmar Antonio Centurión1,2, Christian O. Chávez-Alfonso1 , Laura Beatriz García1,2, Judith María Torales1,2
Citation : Centurión OA, Chávez-Alfonso C, García LB and Torales JM. (2018). Influence of Serum Biomarkers in the Diagnostic, Prog- 5 nostic and Therapeutic Management of Patients with Heart Failure Mathews J Cardiol. 3(1): 017..
Subscribe to our RSS feed, be in touch with our articles, news, videos, reebies.