Advertisement

x

Mathews Journal of Cardiology

2572-6420

Mathews Journal of Cardiology Reviewer Guidelines

Peer Review Process

Mathews Open Access Journals follows double blind peer review process. In this we do not reveal author names, affiliations to the reviewer and vice versa. We adhere to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), code of conduct, and best practice guidelines (http://publicationethics.org). We strive to ensure that the peer review is fair, unbiased and timely. Decisions to accept or reject a manuscript for publication in the journal are based on the manuscript’s importance, originality, clarity, and the study’s validity and its relevance to remit of the journal. The process also involves strictly no plagiarism or fabrication of the data and parallel submissions.

Responsibilities

Being a reviewer you are accountable to take the responsibility of maintaining confidentiality of ideas that have been presented in the papers assigned to review. Focus your evaluation on merits and demerits of the article; assess the correctness, accuracy, clarity, and innovation of the research. Never reveal the assigned paper's results or videos/images or any of the supplementary material to non-reviewers.

The reviewers are given ample time for the review and submission of comments to the editorial office. Reviewers’ evaluations play a major role in our decision as to whether to accept a manuscript for publication.

Ethical Issues

  • The reviewer should be honest, transparent. Should not be biased in the decision, and exact analysis of the research.
  • After receiving the paper for any further assistance or clarifications you need to contact only the editorial office and the confidentiality of the paper has to be maintained.
  • You must never ask anyone to review a portion of paper without editor's permission and also must never contact the author of the paper directly.
  • Final decision in accepting/ rejecting of the manuscript is solely decided by Chief-Editor of the journal.
  • The reviewer can also inform the editor regarding suspected duplicate publication, plagiarism, or any ethical concerns about the use of animals or humans in the research that has be done by author.
Recently Published Articles
Research Article

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Noninvasive Arrhythmia Treatment

Published : 23rd November 2022
Authors : Lili Yang1, Min Li1, Shi Liu1, Lili Chen2, C-M Charlie Ma2
Citation : Yang L, et al. (2022). Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Noninvasive Arrhythmia Treatment. Mathews J Cardiol. 6(1):24.

Review Article

Fibrillation and Flutter of the Heart, Pathological Aspects of the Mechanism

Published : 20th August 2022
Authors : Khabchabov RG*, Makhmudova ER
Citation : Khabchabov RG, et al. (2022). Fibrillation and Flutter of the Heart, Pathological Aspects of the Mechanism. Mathews J Cardiol. 6(1):23.

Mini Review

Myocardial Infarction in Covid-19 Era: A Dramatic Dip into the Past?

Published : 31st December 2020
Authors : Vincenzo De Simone*, Antonio Mugnolo, Alberto Zamboni, Giorgio Morando
Citation : De Simone V, et al. (2020). Myocardial infarction in Covid-19 era: a dramatic dip into the past?. Mathews J Cardiol. (5)1:22.

Case Report

Multimodality Evaluation of Multiple Mitral Valve Myxomas: A Rare, Benign but Potentially Life-Threatening Tumor

Published : 18th September 2019
Authors : Yutian Sun1, Hong Gao1, Boqi Hu2
Citation : Hu B. (2019). Multimodality Evaluation of Multiple Mitral Valve Myxomas: A Rare, Benign but Potentially Life-Threatening Tumor. Mathews J Cardiol 4(1): 21.

Case Report

Test the Vasospastic ST-Segment Depression Reversibility with Nitrates in Non-Obstructive Coronary Disease

Published : 03rd March 2019
Author : Yasser Mohammed Hassanain Elsayed*
Citation :  Elsayed YMH (2019). Test the Vasospastic ST-Segment Depression Reversibility with Nitrates in Non-Obstructive Coronary Disease. Mathews J Cardiol 4(1): 20.

Short Communication

Augmented Atrial Vulnerability in Patients with Sinus Node Dysfunction: Is the Electrophysiologic Abnormality Limited Only to the Sinus Node?

Published : 15th November 2018
Authors : Osmar Antonio Centurión1,2*, FACC, FAHA, José Fernando Alderete1 , Judith María Torales1,2, Laura Beatriz García1,2, Karina Elizabeth Scavenius1
Citation : Centaurión OA, Alderete JF, Morales JM, Garcían LB, et al. (2018). Augmented Atrial Vulnerability in Patients with Sinus Node 3 Dysfunction: Is the Electrophysiologic Abnormality Limited Only to the Sinus Node?. Mathews J Cardiol. 3(1): 019.

Indexed
Root Indexing
J Gate
Scientific Indexing Services
Scilit
WolrdCat
Directory of Research Journals Indexing
Genamics JournalSeek
International Scientific Indexing
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
CiteFactor
Subscribe

Subscribe to our RSS feed, be in touch with our articles, news, videos, reebies.

Antispam Code Generate new code

Creative Commons License

© 2015 Mathews Open Access Journals. All Rights Reserved.

Open Access by Mathews Open Access Journals is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based On a Work at Mathewsopenaccess.com