Peer Review Process
Mathews Open Access Journals follows double blind peer review process. In this we do not reveal author names, affiliations to the reviewer and vice versa. We adhere to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), code of conduct, and best practice guidelines (http://publicationethics.org). We strive to ensure that the peer review is fair, unbiased and timely. Decisions to accept or reject a manuscript for publication in the journal are based on the manuscript’s importance, originality, clarity, and the study’s validity and its relevance to remit of the journal. The process also involves strictly no plagiarism or fabrication of the data and parallel submissions.
Being a reviewer you are accountable to take the responsibility of maintaining confidentiality of ideas that have been presented in the papers assigned to review. Focus your evaluation on merits and demerits of the article; assess the correctness, accuracy, clarity, and innovation of the research. Never reveal the assigned paper's results or videos/images or any of the supplementary material to non-reviewers.
The reviewers are given ample time for the review and submission of comments to the editorial office. Reviewers’ evaluations play a major role in our decision as to whether to accept a manuscript for publication.
Published : 20th November 2023
Authors : Gleb N Levitsky1,*, Andrey S Levitsky2, Elena A Kovrazhkina3, Alexander A Poloyko1
Citation : Levitsky GN, et al. (2023). Comprehensive Fibromyalgia Treatment in Russian Private Center. Mathews J Neurol. 7(2):25.
Published : 11th July 2023
Authors : Ravi Kumar*, Arvind Kumar, Vimal Kumar Bharti, Bhuwanendra Singh, Kuldeep Saini, Sunita Jha, Minata
Citation : Kumar R, et al. (2023). Role of Biomarkers in Pathogenesis and Updated Treatment of Motor Neuron Disease: A Review Article. Mathews J Neurol. 7(2):24.
Published : 15th February 2023
Authors : Bita Shalbafan1,*, Seyed Kianoosh Naghibzadeh2, Hajar Aminzadeh3,4, Hossein Lanjanian5,6, Bardia D Baloutch7, Katayon Berjis8, Hamid Sajjadi9,10
Citation : Shalbafan B, et al. (2023). Case Report: An IIH Induced Endometriosis that Diagnosed by OCT, and Revealed Ten Years Dilemma of HPG Axis Dysfunction due to Pressure Effect of CSF on Pituitary Stalk. Mathews J Neurol. 7(1):23.
Published : 17th January 2023
Author : Samah Khaled Zahran*
Citation : Zahran SK, et al. (2023). Social Neurocognition: A Brief Review of Some Aspects. Mathews J Neurol. 7(1):22.
Published : 09th January 2023
Authors : Boukadir Chahrazad,* Ouardi Souhila, Bouchaour Smail, Boukhalfa Meriem, Khalfaoui Meriem, Kasmi Lynda, Ali Guechi Yasmine, Lahouassa Khalil, Zemmouchi Nadjoua, Meftah Chanez, Khalef Sadek, Kassouri Nora, Amer El Khedoud Wahiba
Citation : Chahrazad B, et al. (2023). The Different Clinical Phenotypes of Huntington's Disease, About Ten Families. Mathews J Neurol. 7(1):21.
Published : 31st December 2022
Authors : Bita Shalbafan1,*, Seyed Kianoosh Naghibzadeh2, Hajar Aminzadeh3,4, Hossein Lanjanian5,6, Bardia D Baloutch7, Hamid Sajjadi8,9
Citation : Shalbafan B, et al. (2022). Case Report: Optical Coherence Tomography, as a Non-Invasive Approach to Evaluate Intracranial Pressure in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Patients, as with their Treatment Follow-ups and VP Shunts Reprogramming Procedures. Mathews J Neurol. 6(1):020.