Peer Review Process
Mathews Open Access Journals follows double blind peer review process. In this we do not reveal author names, affiliations to the reviewer and vice versa. We adhere to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), code of conduct, and best practice guidelines (http://publicationethics.org). We strive to ensure that the peer review is fair, unbiased and timely. Decisions to accept or reject a manuscript for publication in the journal are based on the manuscript’s importance, originality, clarity, and the study’s validity and its relevance to remit of the journal. The process also involves strictly no plagiarism or fabrication of the data and parallel submissions.
Being a reviewer you are accountable to take the responsibility of maintaining confidentiality of ideas that have been presented in the papers assigned to review. Focus your evaluation on merits and demerits of the article; assess the correctness, accuracy, clarity, and innovation of the research. Never reveal the assigned paper's results or videos/images or any of the supplementary material to non-reviewers.
The reviewers are given ample time for the review and submission of comments to the editorial office. Reviewers’ evaluations play a major role in our decision as to whether to accept a manuscript for publication.
Published : 03rd April 2021
Authors : S.Tshimanga1*, A. Fouad1, K. Fakiri1, N. Rada1, G. Draiss1, N. Soraa2, B. Admou3, M. Bouskraoui1
Citation : S Tshimanga, A Fouad, K Fakiri, N Rada, G Draiss, N Soraa, et al. (2021). Secondary Bronchiectasis due to HIV Infection in Children. Mathews J HIV AIDS. 5(1):21.
Published : 25th September 2019
Authors : Olorunfemi Stephen
Citation : Stephen O. (2019). HIV Drugs Resistance - A Possible Consequence of Massive Anti-Retroviral Roll Out in Developing Countries - an Urgent Call For 1
Proper Monitoring (Part 1). Mathews J HIV AIDS 4(1): 20.
Published : 12th November 2018
Authors : Paulo Pereira1*, Sandra Xavier2
Citation : Pereira P and Xavier S. (2018). Computation of the Diagnostic Uncertainty as an Alternative to the Determination of Measurement Uncertainty for HIV Qualitative Binary Results. Mathews J HIV AIDS 3(1): 019
Published : 23rd July 2018
Authors : Berry Ikolango Bongenya1*, Ramazani Nemwanjare Bukongo1 , Ben Ilunga Bulanda1, Divine chuga1, Jean Yves Debels Kabasele1, Medard Omakoy Okonda1, Christian Tshisumbu1, Erick Ntambwe kamangu*1,2
Citation : Kamangu EN, Bongenya BI, Bukongo RN, Bulanda BI, et al. (2018). Gender Difference in Early Treatment Patients for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.Mathews J HIV AIDS. 3(1): 018
Published : 05th January 2018
Authors : Callist L. Chomboko1*, Rogatus M. Kabyemera2 , Benson R. Kidenya3, Erasmus Kamugisha 3*
Citation : Kamugisha E, Chomboko CL, Kabyemera RM, and Kidenya BR. (2018). Prevalence and Predictors of Immunological Treatment Failure among HIV Infected Adults on the First-line Antiretroviral Therapy in Mbeya Region, Tanzania. Mathews J HIV AIDS. 3(1): 017
Published : 08th December 2017
Authors : Erasmus Kamugisha1 *, Jeremiah Kidola2 , Stephen E. Mshana3
Citation : Kamugisha E, Kidola J and Mshana SE. (2017). HIV p24 Antigen Assay in the Diagnosis of Immunological Failure Among Patients with HIV Infection in Mwanza City. Mathews J HIV AIDS. 2(1): 016
Subscribe to our RSS feed, be in touch with our articles, news, videos, reebies.